IncoAbout IncoIndustrial Strength InformationInco in the News*Investor's Portfolio*For Teachers Only

2.3 Ecological Processes and Relationships

"We must understand that ecological processes vary in their effects or importance at different spatial and temporal scales...We must also recognize that different species and groups of organisms, including humans, operate at different spatial scales." (Hammond and Innes 1997:5)

The relationship and dynamics that exist among the animals, habitat, and people in the Landscape Region can be understood through the principles of ecology (the study of interactions between organisms and their environment). The basic functional unit of ecology is the ecosystem (Hickman et al. 1979: 946). Ecosystems include both the living (i.e., plants, animals, and miroorganisms) and non-living (e.g., land and water) components of the environment. An ecosystem is made up of communities, which are species that share the same environment and have a distinctive unity, such as the plants and animals found in a particular type of tundra, forest, or wetlands. Communities, in turn, are composed of a number of populations. A population is an interbreeding group of organisms of the same species. The lowest level of organization within an ecosystem is the individual organism.

"Ecologists define them [landscapes] as ecosystem mosaics - heterogeneous land areas composed of clusters of interacting ecosystems that are repeated in similar form." (Hammond and Innes 1997: 3)

To understand the complex interactions that occur within and between ecosystems, it is important to consider the elements of time and distance (i.e. the dynamics and size of the ecosystem). For example, the time scale for understanding the behaviour of a particular species' behaviour may be only a few days (e.g., when caribou move west from coastal areas towards calving areas on the plateau), an entire year (e.g., migrating species) or hundreds to thousands of years (e.g., Innu and Inuit cultural ties to the land and animals, and biological evolution). Likewise, in some cases, it is necessary to understand the movements of animals on continental scales of distance (e.g., shorebirds migrating from Labrador to South America). For other purposes, it may be sufficient to understand the ecosystem of an isolated pond or lake. As there are numerous ecosystems occurring within Labrador and the Landscape Region, and movement occurs among and within these ecosystems, it is necessary to consider these interactions at a larger scale. Landscape ecology, discussed in Section 2.3.2, considers the interactions and relationships among people, climate, land, water, ice, vegetation, and animals across a large geographical area.
 
 

2.3.1 Ecosystems

Animals are classified as carnivores (flesh eaters), herbivores (plant eaters), or omnivores (animals that feed on both plants and other animals).

Plants are the primary producers in an ecosystem. They provide energy to herbivorous animals, which are, in turn, consumed by carnivores. Thus, the energy of the sun is captured by plants, and through feeding relationships, transferred to higher trophic levels in the food web. The productivity of the primary producers limits the size of animal populations in any ecosystem. Animal species at or near the top of the food web have populations that are smaller in biomass and numbers than those of species on which they feed.

"Once you could only fit three or four caribou on a Kamutik (sled), now you can stack seven or eight on a Kamutik, even without skinning and butchering them" (Williamson 1997:26).

These relationships can be illustrated by the George River Caribou Herd, which is closely tied to vegetation structure and productivity and the seasonal availability of food biomass. Since the turn of the century, the herd has been increasing in numbers (Messier et al. 1988; Bergerud 1994). Recently however, Inuit of northern Labrador, who hunt this herd, have observed that caribou numbers are declining, and that individuals are smaller than they were 30 years ago and appear to carry more diseases and parasites (Williamson 1997). Many people believe the herd has reached a point at which there is no longer enough food to maintain a healthy population (Williamson 1997). Thus, the productivity of the primary producers (i.e., lichens and other foods of caribou) limits the size of animal populations higher in the food web (i.e., the caribou herd). Historical information suggests that these longer term changes in the caribou population may be part of a re-occurring cycle.

While the survival of many animal species is dependent on vegetation, many plant species are influenced by foraging herbivores, or are dependent on birds and mammals for seed dispersal. Some plants respond to mammal and insect foraging by developing defensive chemicals that reduce their palatability or digestibility. Insects play an important role in pollinating plants, while invertebrate and microbial species create the soil conditions which allow plant life to grow. In Labrador, humans also influence vegetation through the harvest of trees, berry crops, and medicinal plants.

Herbivores, such as caribou, are not only linked to lower trophic levels, but also support a number of higher-level predators, particularly wolves, black bears, and humans. In Labrador, the links between predators and prey is demonstrated by the observation that wolf numbers increased following an increase in the George River Caribou Herd population (Parker and Luttich 1986; Williamson 1997). Similarly, the hunting patterns of Aboriginal peoples have also been greatly affected by past increases of the herd, and now its potential decline. As the herd increased, and its range expanded to include the coastal zone, the need for hunters to travel further inland was eliminated. If caribou become more scarce on the coast in winter, Inuit will have to return to their inland hunting areas (Williamson 1997).

This pattern of interaction also occurs at smaller scales. For example, small herbivores such as Arctic hare, beaver, northern bog-lemming, porcupine, red-backed vole, red squirrel, rock vole, and snowshoe hare are all dependent on particular aspects of vegetation structure and availability. In turn, their predators such as ermine, lynx, marten, mink, and red fox are dependent on these herbivores for prey. One well-known example of interdependency is that of the snowshoe hare and lynx (Keith et al. 1984). Studies have shown that cyclic changes in the snowshoe hare population are influenced by a combination of vegetation change and predation. Changes in lynx population (which prey on snowshoe hares) closely track these changes. Inuit have observed a similar interdependency between snowy owl and its prey of mice and lemmings (Williamson 1997).

The complexity of the connections within terrestrial ecosystems is further illustrated by the existence of omnivores that may be predator or prey, herbivore or carnivore. For example, red squirrels will eat practically any animals they can catch, including deer mice, voles, young hares, and birds (Obbard 1987). Species such as red fox and marten supplement a mostly carnivorous diet with seasonally available berries (Voigt 1987; Strickland and Douglas 1987). Black bears depend on vegetation (such as berries and grasses) in their diet, but will also feed on caribou, fish, small mammals, and insects. In turn, black bears are hunted by Aboriginal peoples (Black Bear Management Workshop 1997).

Bioaccumulation refers to contaminants that accumulate in increasing concentrations in organisms higher up the food chain.

Species at the top of the food web may be particularly sensitive to changes in the environment. For example, populations of peregrine falcons in North America suffered drastic declines in the 1950s and 1960s, attributed to the widespread use of the pesticide DDT (Cade et al. 1988). The chemical bioaccumulated in these birds, causing egg shells to thin to the point that eggs broke under the weight of the incubating adult. With restrictions on DDT use in the 1970s, and recovery programs involving the release of captive-raised young, downward trends in peregrine falcon populations have been largely reversed and recovery is occurring throughout much of its range (Godfrey 1986; Cade et al. 1988; Palmer 1988).

"...In the shallow areas around the Voisey's Bay area...everything have to be considered...all the little species that are around the ponds and in the willows, the bugs, I don't know what they are called, but they are part of the food chain...even by the fish they are eaten, cause the fish eat anything that falls into the lakes...". (from Williamson 1997:73)

Ecosystems complexity can also be seen in the freshwater environment of Labrador. Rivers, streams, ponds, and lakes provide habitat for aquatic vertebrate and invertebrate species. Fish such as brook and lake trout, Atlantic salmon and Arctic charr are just some of the species which depend on freshwater ecosystems to provide spawning and nursery habitat. These species feed on insects and other invertebrates living in the water. Connections also exist between the freshwater and terrestrial ecosystems. For example, small fish become prey for large fish, which in turn, become prey for otter, mink and osprey. Freshwater ecosystems also provide important foods for humans, including Arctic charr, Atlantic salmon, trout, and northern pike.

The marine ecosystem of coastal Labrador is interconnected with both the freshwater and terrestrial ecosystems. Some species of fish, notably Atlantic salmon and Arctic charr, spend part of their life cycle in the marine environment. As a result, an accessible route between freshwater and marine ecosystems is essential. Marine ecosystems function in much the same way as terrestrial and aquatic systems, in that microscopic plankton (both plant and animal) provide food for intermediate species, such as cod, capelin, herring, shrimp, and filter-feeders such as scallops. These in turn provide food for marine mammals, including whales, seals, dolphins, and porpoises. Killer whales and polar bears, at the top of the food web, prey on bearded, grey, harbour, harp and ringed seals. Seals and marine fish are also an important component of the human diet in Labrador.

Numerous bird species inhabit terrestrial and marine near-shore environments, including harlequin duck and more abundant species such as Arctic tern, black scoter, Canada goose, common eider, common goldeneye, glaucous gull, great black-backed gull, green-winged teal, herring gull, Iceland gull, mallard, northern pintail, oldsquaw, and red-breasted merganser (JWEL 1997b). Seabirds such as common and thick-billed murres and black guillemots also inhabit coastal areas and offshore islands. They feed on marine fish and may, in turn, be preyed upon by peregrine falcons. Gulls prey on eggs and young of waterfowl and seabird species. Many of these species are harvested by the Innu and Inuit of Labrador, who have observed that some populations of migratory birds are decreasing (Williamson 1997). This decrease is partially attributed to the connection between seabirds and the marine ecosystem. The scarcity of food from the sea, such as capelin, is said to be affecting populations of seabirds that depend on fish for food, and is also causing gulls, which would normally feed on fish, to prey more aggressively on the eggs and young of sea ducks and other species.

"Innu harvesting activities are generally highly integrated and may shift rapidly from one kind to another depending on circumstances." (Armitage 1990:52)

Humans are probably one of the best examples of a species that plays a role in many different ecosystems. Humans move freely among terrestrial, freshwater, and marine environments, and have the ability to use many different resources. Aboriginal people in Labrador have long harvested species at all levels in the food web, from capelin to seals to polar bear, and from berries to Arctic hare to black bear. Therefore, changes that affect any part of the terrestrial, freshwater, or marine ecosystems have the potential to affect humans.
 
 

2.3.2 Ecosystem Integrity

All ecosystems are composed of communities, populations and organisms that interact within a unique and complex web of linkages. Due to a variety of natural and human-related factors, some ecosystems are healthier than others. The term used to describe the overall "health" of an ecosystem is ecological integrity. The following factors are the key indicators of ecological integrity (Karr 1993; Woodley et al. 1993; Freedman 1995):
 
  • Resistance and Resilience to Changes in the Intensity of Environmental Stress: Ecological resistance refers to the capacity of organisms, populations, and communities to tolerate an increased intensity of stress without exhibiting a notable response. Resilience refers to the ability to recover from disturbance, pollution, or some other stress. Moose are an example of a species with a high capability to recover from disturbance. Moose feed on primary successional plants (e.g., aspen, birch) associated with recent fires, or clearing of forest vegetation associated with a harvesting operation or the die back from an insect outbreak. The expansion of the range of moose in Labrador occurred along areas of disturbance such as the railway in the west and via river valleys elsewhere (Trimper et al. 1996:42). Other species, such as beluga whale, are less resistant and resilient to environmental stress (e.g. pollution). Some populations of beluga whales are classified as endangered by the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Resilience of ecosystems are directly related to the level of ecological integrity.

  •  
  • Biodiversity: Biodiversity is a comprehensive term for the complexity of a land region, including the number and distributions of ecosystems, species, and genes in a given area. Indigenous elements of biodiversity (such as native species) are positive indicators of ecological integrity, compared to non-indigenous species. Each of the ecosystems present in the Landscape Region have varying degrees of biodiversity, but all are almost entirely composed of native species.

  •  
  • Complexity in Structure and Function: The structural and functional complexities of ecosystems are influenced by both human activities and natural environmental factors associated with climate, moisture, soils, and environmental chemistry. An example of an ecosystem in the Landscape Region that is essentially simple in structure is the coastal barrens, which is comprised of exposed bedrock substrate, lichen, occasional simple plan/shrub layer, no forest canopy, and few wildlife species. In comparison, forest habitats in the Landscape Region are much more complex in structure and function, and support many more species and greater productivity.

  •  
  • Presence of Large and Long-Lived Species: Large species in an ecosystem require relatively great amounts of resources and extensive areas to sustain their populations. Large species are relatively long-lived and, therefore, accumulate the effects of environmental stress over an extended time. In general, ecosystems which are subjected to intense environmental stress cannot support many large species. Mature ecosystems, which are not subjected to as much environmental stress, tend to be dominated by large, long-lived species. The presence of large white spruce trees (exceeding 200 years of age) that have escaped previous forest fires and a 24-year old black bear located during baseline research (JWEL 1997g) suggest the Landscape Region has ecological integrity.

  •  
  • Presence of Higher-Order Predators: Higher-order predators depend on a broad base of ecological productivity, and can only be sustained by relatively extensive and/or productive ecosystems. There are several top-order predators (polar bear, beluga, black bear, wolf, and peregrine falcon) in the Landscape Region, including humans, which suggests the area provides a relatively broad base of ecological productivity, and has great ecological integrity.

  •  
  • Intrinsic Capability to Maintain their Natural Ecological Values: Ecosystems will have greater ecological integrity when they can maintain their species, communities, and other important characteristics naturally, without human intervention through management. In other words, if a rare species can only be sustained if its habitat is managed by humans, then its population and ecosystem are considered lacking in integrity. A high level of integrity within an ecosystem would suggest a high level of integrity within the Landscape Region as well.

  •  
  • Controlled Nutrient Cycling: Biological influences that help to retain nutrients in a site, so that the "capital" of these ecologically critical factors are not lost, often happen following severe disturbance or pollution. For example, by absorbing nutrients from their environment, and assimilating them into their biomass, growing plants act as a biological "sponge" that helps to prevent soluble nutrients form leaching away, and thereby being lost from the system. In the Landscape Region, the plant fireweed plays this sort of role in the early stages of post-fire succession, as do the other plants of the communities that rapidly re-develop after this kind of natural disturbance.

  •  
  • Conservation of Ecosystem Biomass: Ecosystems that are not experiencing severe environmental stress or disturbance tend to have a stable physical structure, most obviously indicated by a more-or-less constant standing crop of biomass over time. If severe stress occurs, however, increases in both mortality and ecosystem-level respiration will cause the quantities of living and total (living and dead) biomass of the system to degrade. This is an important indicator of loss of ecological integrity. In the Landscape Region, natural disturbance by wildfire causes this to happen during the successional stages known as "reorganization", which persist for decades. A similar change could be caused to terrestrial ecosystems by severe air pollution.

  •  
     

    2.3.3 Perspective of Landscape and Seascape Ecology

    Landscape ecology is an approach used to examine the interactions and relationships among people, climate, land, water, ice, vegetation and animals.

    "The various components of a landscape are distinguished and described not only in terms of physical features and ecosystem types, but in terms of how energy and materials are transported and distributed across the landscape by biogeophysical processes, species movements or human activities." (Hammond and Innes 1997: 3)

    Often, issues of environmental change and ecological integrity occur at large scales, both of time and distance. Landscape ecology recognizes the holistic nature of the land and ocean, and provides a context for addressing how ecosystems influence and respond to change. Ecological interactions are understood by incorporating appropriate spatial and temporal scales in discussing particular species and their interactions. The following are some of the more useful concepts in landscape ecology:
     

  • Areas where a species is commonly found are called patches. For example, a stand of vegetation, such as spruce forest, or ponds and lakes used by landlocked fish, are patches. Patches may attract wildlife or serve as a conduit for their movements. Large patches are called influence zones (such as rivers or coastlines), because they affect much of the surrounding system.

  •  
  • Flow refers to the movement of species, water, nutrients, and processes across the landscape, and is one of the most important concepts in landscape ecology. It is critical to understand flow in terms of short and long periods of time (shorter and longer temporal scales), and over smaller and larger areas (smaller and larger spatial scales). Animals can flow from patch to patch over a small spacial scale in search of food. Migratory movement is a flow over a long distance scale.


  • A corridor is a patch, or series of patches, that promotes the flow of animals. A barrier is a patch, or series of patches, that hinders the flow of animals. A corridor for one species can be a barrier for a different species. For example, a stream is a corridor for fish, but a barrier for small rodents. A corridor is itself is a habitat type for some species, such as fish. River valleys act as corridors for caribou flow, and preferred flyways act as corridors for birds.


  • Principal habitat areas are called core sites or hot spots. Nesting sites for birds and denning sites for mammals are in this category.


  • Landscape change is the relative change in the shape of the landscape. River valleys are sites of landscape change because there are often large variations in water flow, leading to changes in the shape of stream banks. Landscape change can also be caused by disturbances, such as forest fires.


  • Landscape stability is the relative degree of constancy in the landscape. Bedrock outcrops, for example, are relatively stable landscape features.


  • Keystone species play a special function in an ecosystem. Generally, they provide the habitat or conditions that other species could not live without. An example of a keystone species in this landscape is the caribou. Caribou is a primary food item for bears, lynx, wolves, and people. The movements of caribou typically affect the movements of all its predators.


  • Umbrella species generally require large areas of habitat and are found near the top of the food web. The stability of these species in indicative of the health of those species supporting the food web. An example of an umbrella species in this landscape is Arctic charr, as it occurs near the top of the aquatic food web and a healthy population of charr implies healthy insect populations (a principal food of charr) and water quality.


  • Vulnerable species or special conservation status species are found at low densities, or are dependent on a small amount of habitat for a part of their lives. An example of a vulnerable species occurring within the Landscape Region is the eastern population of the harlequin duck, which occurs in low numbers across much of coastal and interior Labrador, and is considered to be endangered.


  • Flagship species are important from a societal viewpoint. A species that is hunted often becomes a flagship species for a local community that derives food, profit, cultural, and spiritual value from it. Many species present in the Landscape Region are hunted and, as a result, could be considered a flagship species. Examples of the more important flagship species in the Landscape Region include caribou, Arctic charr, and seals.
  • Examples of Ecological Movements and Interactions

    Although landscape ecology can be used to discuss all human and wildlife movements and interactions within the Landscape Region, the following discussion will focus on a few representative species that illustrate some important functions in the landscape. The figures on the following pages are used to show some of the movements and locations of these species in the Landscape Region. Species selected represent broad categories (i.e., marine mammals, fish, and birds) and are considered unique from an ecological management perspective (i.e., keystone, umbrella, vulnerable, and flagship species). Information is taken from both direct observations and information extrapolated from known habitat preferences and landscape and seascape features.

    Because Labrador is located between tundra and boreal forest regions, its ecosystems consist of resident and seasonal migrants representative of both regions. Migrants (e.g., waterfowl, shorebirds, whales) may originate from as far as South America or as near as Baffin Island. Many animals found in Labrador and Ungava are present during the summer to breed before moving south in search of other landscapes. Each summer, for example, several seal species, whales, and polar bears appear along the coast (Figure 2.7). The presence of these species depends largely on the time of year, since most of those occurring in Labrador are migratory.
     

    Figure 2.7 Migration of Marine Mammals Through
    the Labrador Sea

    The minke whale is the most common whale feeding off Labrador waters in the summer, but by October or November most have begun their migration south to Florida (Lien 1985). Because it is at the top of its food web, the minke whale is considered an umbrella species. Its continued existence implies species below it in the food web are also healthy.

    "You go out there [the sina] end of March and first of April, you can see...bunches of eider ducks in small open holes...the polar bears are migrating too...they're following the route [the sina].." Williamson 1997: 69)

    Labrador is the southern extent of the range of some species. Polar bears spend most of the year in the Arctic, but usually appear on the Labrador coast during the spring and occasionally during the summer. The number of polar bears on the Labrador coast each year depends on ice conditions, as most apparently drift south on ice floes to hunt ringed seals. The polar bear is an example of a vulnerable species because it exists at low densities and moves over very large areas annually.

    Most shorebirds (e.g., white-rumped sandpiper and semipalmated plover) breeding or staging in Labrador migrate along resting and feeding areas to winter in Central and South America (Figure 2.8). At this scale, Labrador represents a small, though absolutely vital, component (core site or hot spot) of the annual habitat requirements of all those species.
     

    Figure 2.8 Shorebird Migration Routes North
    and South

    Other seasonal migrants, such as waterfowl, may move shorter distances. For example, harlequin ducks leave their breeding habitat in Labrador to winter along the Atlantic coast from Newfoundland to the southeastern United States (Figure 2.9).
     

    Figure 2.9 Distribution of Harlequin Ducks in Eastern North America

    An example of a population moving great distances across the Labrador landscape is the George River Caribou Herd. These far-ranging animals congregate in the thousands during spring calving, often hundreds of kilometres from the winter feeding areas (Figure 2.10). Within the Landscape Region, river valleys serve as important corridors for caribou movement. Since 1992-1993, some caribou have used coastal habitat within the Saglek/Hopedale Land Region during winter for foraging, relief from deep snow, and predator avoidance (J. Schaefer, pers. comm.). As many as 10,000 individuals (one to two percent of the total herd) move in a northeasterly direction from the main wintering area to the west to occupy the coastal influence zone for up to four months. Areas between patches of winter habitat on the coast may provide temporary corridors subject to changing habitat factors (e.g., snow and ice conditions). With the onset of spring melting conditions (late April-early May), caribou have been observed moving westward along river valleys to the calving area in the vicinity of George River.

    At the Landscape Region scale, the coastal, riverine and interior influence zones have profound effects on the movement of species. Watercourses, and their associated watersheds often are dominant features of the landscape. While some species do not recognize or respond to watercourse boundaries and can be found throughout the Landscape Region, others occur only in particular riverine or lake habitats.
     

    Figure 2.10 Movements of the George River
    Caribou Herd

    "...ice fishing continues on into the spring, but the sites change according to travel conditions and the movement of charr." (Williamson 1997: 55)

    An important influence zone in the Landscape Region are watersheds (Figure 2.11) that drain to the coast via streams and rivers. The rivers in these watersheds are also major access routes from the coast to the interior, providing migration routes for various species, including Arctic charr and harlequin duck.
     

    Figure 2.11 Watershed Boundaries of the Largest Rivers in the Landscape Region

    Landlocked Arctic charr are distributed throughout the region, occurring primarily in patches defined by isolated ponds and lakes that became cut off from the ocean by post-glacial uplift of the land, which created rapids and waterfalls impossible to cross on the streams draining these waterbodies (Figure 2.12).
     

    Figure 2.12 Distribution of Anadromous Stocks of Arctic Charr

    Anadromous charr populations are distributed along the entire coast of Labrador, most abundantly in the area north of Hamilton Inlet. Typically, the anadromous stocks spawn and are reared in freshwater, and move down the stream and river influence zones to the sea at age 3 to 4 years. While at sea, the smolt and adults tend to remain in the local bays to which their home river drains.

    Harlequin ducks (Figure 2.13) use a variety of patches and corridors in the Landscape Region. Adult birds appear along the ice-edge influence zone and in estuaries in late April/early May where they use patches of open water. As the river ice breaks up, individuals fly upstream using the river as a corridor. By June, breeding pairs are established on their patches of territory along a river system of rapids and pools. Males begin to leave these habitats in mid-June and fly north to moulting areas in the Labrador Sea. Broods hatch in mid-July and remain within a patch of brood rearing habitat until late in the summer. If the water levels drop substantially, however, the broods follow the river corridor downstream to deep-water patches or into estuaries. All harlequin ducks migrate south in the fall to winter out of the Landscape Region.

    Figure 2.13 Distribution of Harlequin Ducks
    in the Landscape Region

    Hawks, falcons, and eagles nest on the steep cliffs (Figure 2.14) associated with the river valleys. Their breeding habitats include coastal islands and along all of the major waterways: the Fraser River, Kogaluk River and Notakwanon River, and Anaktalik Brook and Konrad Brook (JWEL 1995; JWEL 1996). Golden eagle, peregrine falcon, and gyrfalcon use specific cliffs with suitable ledges/overhangs as nesting sites, primarily within the Fraser River Land Region and Saglek/Hopedale Land Region. These species may occur within the Landscape Region from late March to November, when they occupy a core site or nest within a territory which they defend, and a broader area over which they forage for prey. Migration corridors of these predatory birds into and out of the Landscape Region are unknown.

    Figure 2.14 Distribution of Cliff-Nesting Raptors in the Landscape Region

    "Voisey's Bay has always been considered a good place for otter because of the many rivers flowing into the Bay" (Williamson 1997: 29).

    River otters occur inland along all of the major rivers (Banfield 1974). Otters are most abundant within the aquatic and riverbank habitats of the Fraser River Land Region. Their movement along waterways is similar to those of harlequin ducks and anadramous fish. Within an individual's home range, river valleys serve as influence zones and corridors. On occasion, and where barriers such as steep hills do not exist, influence zones may include more than one drainage system. A consistently high density of river otter in these areas, even with intensive trapping, can be interpreted as indicative of the ecological integrity of freshwater systems.

    "...you got the harp seals come out past the sina in the spring, leaves their migrating place and goes north starting March..." (from Williamson 1997:72).

    In addition to the major watersheds, the other major influence zone is the coastal islands and shoreline. For seals (and marine mammals in general), the land-sea boundary at the ice edges (in winter) and shorelines (in summer) are important for movement and habitat use. Six species of seals occur throughout the seascape of the Landscape Region during summer (Figure 2.15): harp, hooded, ringed, harbour, and (less commonly) gray and bearded. In winter, harp and hooded seals move along the edge of the fast ice to regions far to the south, while harbour seals tend to move along the fast ice to frozen rivers throughout the Landscape Region. Ringed seals are scattered throughout the zone of fast ice and use the edges of the sina as feeding areas, denning sites, whelping grounds, and dispersal points into the sea. They follow the sina throughout the winter as ice forms and breaks up in response to changes in air temperature and wind.
     

    Figure 2.15 Distribution of Seals in the Landscape Region

    The common eider (Figure 2.16) uses the land-sea boundary in the summer for breeding on coastal islands and feeding on molluscs in intertidal and shallow subtidal zones. Small islands with some vegetation provide nesting habitat within the Landscape Region, as well as farther north. The Labrador coast serves as a corridor for spring migration. In the fall, individuals migrate along offshore corridors to wintering areas farther south and off the fast ice edge.

    The people of Labrador also respond to the dynamics of the landscape and seascape through their movement patterns. While many communities are located along the coast, people must move across the land and sea to hunt, fish, trap, cut firewood, pick berries, and visit other communities. Water provides access along the coast and inland. Ice acts as a barrier to movement during fall and spring (freezing/thawing), while during winter it may provide access to the sea and inland areas.
     

    Figure 2.16 Distribution of Migration Routes of Eider Duck in the Landscape Region

    Along the coast, seals and caribou provide important resources to both Innu and Inuit, while inland, caribou is the primary resource harvested. When caribou are within the Landscape Region, they generally winter along the coast and islands and then migrate inland along river valley corridors to the calving areas adjacent to the Landscape Region (JWEL 1997h). Caribou wintering along the inland plateaus can be reached by travelling along the frozen river valleys and over the plateaus. Seals are of cultural importance to the Inuit and, as a result, the movements of Inuit closely follows that of seals across the seascape and fast ice throughout the Landscape Region.

    "...life on the land is linked to and inseparable from the social, cultural and spiritual dimension of Inuit life" (Williamson 1997).

    "Kinship plays an essential role in determining access to the land and wildlife resources, and the way in which bush food is distributed among individuals and groups." (Armitage 1990: 123).

    However, human movements (Figure 2.17) across the landscape and seascapes are not solely dictated by the movements of hunted animals. Cultural and social factors are also important influences on human use of the landscape and seascape. For example, socially-determined boundaries, corridors, and patches, such as hunting territories, sealing berths, and berry picking grounds also determine human movements within the Landscape Region. Areas of intensive human use and movements generally occur close to communities, along the coast and nearshore islands, and in the forested inner bays year round. However, people also travel great distances inland in the winter using snowmobiles to access important harvesting areas and places that have special social or cultural significance. The residents of the North Coast communities in Labrador also use the marine ice and water as a corridor to travel to harvesting areas, and to other communities to visit friends and family, thus maintaining social and cultural ties (Brice-Bennett 1977). The major snowmobile and small-boat routes used by the Inuit in the Nain District of Labrador are shown in Figure 2.17, which is a good illustration of human movements across the landscape and seascape. The Inuit have stated that they require this large territory to live as a culture (Williamson 1997).

    The Arctic and sub-Arctic ecosystems in which the Aboriginal people of Labrador live have a relatively low productivity and biomass, as compared to temperate, boreal, or tropical ecosystems. As a result, species upon which they are dependent, such as caribou and seals, require extensive areas of suitable habitat, and this in turn shapes use of the ecosystems by Aboriginal cultures.
     

    Figure 2.17 Major Snowmobile and Small Boat
    Routes for Nain Inuit


    2.4 References

    Anderson, T.C. 1985. The Rivers of Labrador. Can. Spec. Pub. Fish. Aquat. Sci81. 389 p.

    Armitage, P. 1989. Homeland or Wasteland? Contemporary Land Use and Occupancy Amongh the Innu of utshimassit and Sheshatshit and the Impact of Military Expansion. Submission to the Federal Environment Assessment Panel Reviewing Military Flying Activities in Nitassinan. Sheshatshit. NMIA.

    Armitage, P. 1990. Land Use and Occupancy among Innu of Utshimassit and Sheshatshit. Innu Nation, Sheshatshit and Utshimassit, Nitassinan (Labrador-Quebec).

    Atmospheric Environment Service. 1982. Canadian Climate Normals, 1951-1980, Volume 2 Temperature. Environment Canada Climate Program.

    Atmospheric Environment Service. 1992. Ice Thickness Climatology: 1961-1990 Normals. Produced by Ice Climatology Services, Ottawa. p. 64-65.

    Banfield, A.W.F. 1974. The Mammals of Canada. University of Toronto Press, Toronto. 438 p.

    Barkham, S. 1980. A note on the Strait of Belle Isle during the Period of Basque Contact with Indian and Inuit - Etudes Inuit 4:51-58.

    Berger, M.B. and S. Luttich. 1985. Winter range patterns for the caribou populations, including the George River herd, inhabiting Noveau Quebec/ Labrador, 1954-1983. Newfoundland and Labrador Wildlife Division, Progress Report No. 4008. 29 p.

    Bergerud, A.T. 1994. The abundance and distribution of sedentary caribou in Ungava. Newfoundland and Labrador Wildlife Division. 36 p.

    Black Bear Management Workshop. 1997. Minutes from a discussion with Elders, Government representatives, and VBNC. Anaktalak Bay, March 1997. 8 p.

    Borlase, T. 1994. The Labrador Settlers, Metil and Kablunangajuil. Happy Valley Goose Bay: Labrador Integrated School Board.

    Brice-Bennett, C. 1977. Land Use in the Nain and Hopedale Regions. pp. 97-203 In C. Brice-Bennett (eds.).Our Footprints are Everywhere. Labrador Inuit Association, Nain.

    Cade, T.J., J.H. Enderson, C.G. Thelander, and C.M. White (eds). 1988. Peregrine Falcon Populations: Their management recovery. The Peregrine Fund, Inc., Boise, Idaho, 949 p.

    Cox, S.L. 1978. Paleo-Eskimo Occupations of the Northern Labrador Coast. Arctic Anthropology 15(2):96-118.

    DPA. 1989. Data on Resource Use and Community Perceptions for the Communities of North Labrador. Background Report No. 2, prepared for Department of National Defense.

    Dauphine, T.C. Jr., F.W. Anderka, C.A. Drolet and D.T. McLlveen. 1975. Distribution and movements of marked caribou in Ungava, June 1973 to 1974. Can. Wildl. Serv., Progress Note 4b. 19 p.

    Dickins, D.F. 1997. Review of Historical Ice Conditions Affecting the Voisey's Bay Development. A report prepared by D.F. Dickins and Associates for Voisey's Bay Nickel Company.

    Dunbar, M.J. 1951. Eastern Arctic waters. Fish. Res. Board. Can. Bull. No. 88.131p.

    Dunbar, M.J. 1968. Ecological Development in Polar Regions. Study in Evoloution. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey. 119 p.

    Encyclopedia of Newfoundland and Labrador, Vol. 5, p. 142-143.

    Erskine, A.J. 1977. Birds in Boreal Canada. Can. Wildl. Serv. Report Series No. 41, Ottawa, ON. ISBN 0-660-01185-9.

    Falk, K. and S. Mö ller. 1988. Status of the peregrine falcon in south Greenland: population density and reproduction. In T.J. Cale, J.H. Endersen, C.G. Thelander and C.M. White (eds.) Peregrine falcon populations: their management and recovery. The Peregrine Fund Inc., Boise, Idaho.

    Fisheries and Oceans Canada. 1988. Sailing Directions: Labrador and Hudson Bay. Canadian Hydrographic Service, Ottawa. Fs72-13/1988E.

    Fitzhugh, W.W. 1972. Environmental Archaeology and Cultural Systems in Hamilton Inlet, Labrador. Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology Number 16, Washington.

    Fitzhugh, W.W. 1977. Indian and Eskimo/Inuit Settlement History in Labrador: An Archaeological View. pp. 1-41. In C. Brice-Bennett, (Ed). Our Footprints are Everywhere.. Labrador Inuit Association.

    Fitzhugh, W.W. 1978. Maritime Archaic Cultures of the Central and Labrador Coast. Arctic Anthropology 15(2):146-174.

    Fitzhugh, W.W. 1984. Residence Pattern Development in the Labrador Maritime Archaic: Longhouse Models and 1983 Surveys. pp. 6-47 In J. Sproull Thomson and C. Thomson (eds.), Archaeology in Newfoundland and Labrador. Historic Resources Division, Government of Newfoundland and Labrador, St. John's, NF.

    Fitzhugh, W.W. 1994. Staffe Island-1 and the Northern Labrador Dorset-Thule Succession. pp. 239-268. In: D. Morrison and J.L. Pilon (Eds). Threads of Arctic Prehistory: Papers in Honour of William E. Taylor, Jr., Archaeological Survey of Canada Mercury Series Paper 149, Canadian Museum of Civilization, Ottawa, ON.

    Freedman, B. 1995. Environmental Ecology, 2nd ed. Academic Press, San Diego.

    Gilbert, R., A.E. Aitken, and B. Mclaughlin. 1982. A biophysical survey of coastal environments in the vicinity of Nain, Labrador. Offshore Labrador Biological Studies (OLABS) Program Report. OLABS Management Committee.

    Godfrey, W.E. 1986. The birds of Canada. National Musuems of Canada Bulletin No. 203. 428 pp.

    Newfoundland-Labrador Wildlife Division. 1995. George River Caribou, Annual Ranges 1987-1996. Government of Newfoundland and Labrador, Department of Forest Resources and Agrifoods. Goose Bay, Labrador.

    Hammond, H. and L. Innes. 1997. Review of Draft EIS Guidelines. Presentation to Environmental Impact Statement Scoping Hearings for Voisey's Bay Mine and Mill Project by Herb Hammond and Larry Innes, Innu Nation Advisors, April 10, 1997.

    Henriksen, G. 1981. Davis Inlet, Labrador. In J. Helm (ed). Handbook of North American Indians. Vol. 6 Subarctic. Smithsonian Institution, Washington: pp. 169-189.

    Hickman, C.P. Sr., Hickman, C.P. Jr., Hickman M.F., and Roberts L.S. 1979. Integrated Principles of Zoology. The C.V. Mosby Company, St. Louis.

    Hood, B.C. 1993. The Maritime Archaic Indians of Labrador: Investigating Prehistoric Social Organization. Newfoundland Studies 9:163-184.

    JWEL (Jacques Whitford Environment Limited). 1995. 1994 Avoidance Monitoring Program, Raptor/Harlequin Duck. Prepared by Jacques Whitford Environment Ltd. for PMO Goose Bay, National Defense Headquarters. Ottawa, ON.

    JWEL. 1996. 1995 Avoidance Monitoring Program, Raptor/Harlequin Duck. Prepared by Jacques Whitford Environment Ltd. for PMO Goose Bay, National Defense Headquarters. Ottawa, ON.

    JWEL. 1997a. Vosiey's Bay Environmental Baseline Technical Data Report: Air Quality. Voisey's Bay Nickel Company, St. John's, NF.

    JWEL. 1997b. Voisey's Bay Environmental Baseline Technical Data Report: Avifauna. Voisey's Bay Nickel Company, St. John's, NF.

    JWEL. 1997c. Voisey's Bay Environmental Baseline Technical Data Report: Ecological Land Classification. Voisey's Bay Nickel Company, St. John's, NF.

    JWEL. 1997d. Voisey's Bay Environmental Baseline Technical Data Report: Intertidal and Subtidal. Voisey's Bay Nickel Company, St. John's, NF.
    JWEL. 1997e. Voisey's Bay Environmental Baseline Technical Data Report: Marine Fauna. Voisey's Bay Nickel Company, St. John's, NF.

    JWEL. 1997f. Voisey's Bay Environmental Baseline Technical Data Report: Fish and Fish Habitat. Voisey's Bay Nickel Company, St. John's, NF..

    JWEL. 1997g. Voisey's Bay Environmental Baseline Technical Data Report: Black Bear. Voisey's Bay Nickel Company, St. John's, NF..

    JWEL 1997h. Voisey's Bay Environmental Baseline Technical Data Report: Caribou. Voisey's Bay Nickel Company, St. John's, NF.

    JWEL, Mushuau Innu Band Council, and Torngâ suk Cultural Centre. 1997. Voisey's Bay Historic Resources Technical Data Report. Voisey's Bay Nickel Company, St. John's, NF.

    Karr, J. 1993. Defining and assessing ecological integrity: Beyond water quality. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 12: 1521-1531.

    Keith, L., J.R. Cary, O.J. Ringstad and M.C. Brittingham. 1984. Demography and ecology of a declining snowshoe hare population. Wildl. Monogr. 90. 43 p.

    Kennedy, J.C. 1982. Holding The Line: Ethnic Boundaries in a Northern Labrador Community. Institute of Social Economic Research, Memorial University of Newfoundland MUN, Social and Economic Studies No. 27.

    LMA (Labrador Metis Association). n.d. Background - Labrador Metis Association. Section of document by the LMA. Copy on file at Jacques Whitford Environment, 607 Torbay Road, St. John's, NF.

    Lancaster, A., D. Kearney, and J.M. Gray. 1993. Newfoundland & Labrador Marine Weather Guide. Environment Canada Publication En 56-104/1993E.

    Leacock, E.B. and N.A. Rothschild (eds). 1994. Labrador Winter. The Ethnographic Journals of William Duncan Strong, 1927/1928. Smithsonian Institute Press, Washington, D.C.

    Lien, J. 1985. Wet and fat: whales and seals of Newfoundland and Labrador. Breakwater Books Ltd., St. John's, NF.

    Lock, A.R. 1986. A census of common eiders breeding in Labrador and the Maritime Provinces. In A. Reed (ed.) Eider Ducks in Canada. Can. Wildl. Serv. Report Series No. 47, Ottawa, ISBN 0-660-53257-3.

    Loring, S.G. 1992. Princes and Princesses of Ragged Fame: Innu Archaeology and Ethnohistory in Labrador. Unpublished Ph.D Disseration, Department of Anthropology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Loring, S. 1994. Afterword and Bibliographic Essay. Pp 185-214. In E. B. Leacock and N.A. Rothschild (eds) . Labrador Winter. The Ethnographic Journals of William Duncan Strong, 1927/1928. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington.

    Lopoukhine, N., N.A. Prout and H.E. Hirvonen. 1978. The Ecological Land Classification of Forest Lands and Associated Wildlands. Publ. 1264. Subcommittee on Bio-Physical Land Classification, Can. Dept. Fish. Forest., Can. Forestry Ser., Ottawa, ON.

    Mailhot, José 1993. Au Pays des Innus: Les Gens de Sheshatshit. Coll. Signes des Amériques 9, Recherches Amérindiennes au Québec, Montréal.

    Messier, F., J. Hout, D. Le-Henaff and S. Luttich. 1988. Demography of the George River Caribou Herd: evidence of population regulation by forage exploitation and range expansion. Arctic 41: 279-287.

    Montevecchi, W.A., A. Bourget, J. Brazil, R.I. Goudie, A.E. Hutchinson, B.C. Johnson, Kehoe, P. Laporte, M.A. McCullough, R. Milton, and N. Seymour. 1995. National Recovery Plan for the Harlequin Duck in Eastern North America. Report No. 12. Recovery of Nationally Endangered Wildlife Committee.

    Nagle, C. 1978. Indian Occupations of the Intermediate Period on the Central Labrador Coast: A Preliminary Synthesis. Arctic Anthropology XV(2):119-145.

    Newton, I. 1979. Population ecology of raptors. Buteo Books, Vermillion, SD. 399 pp.

    Novak, M. 1987. Beaver. pp. 282-312. In M. Novak, J.A. Baker, M.E. Obbard and B. Malloch. (eds). Wild furbearer management and conservation in North America. Min. of Nat. Resources, Toronto ISBN 0-7743-9365-3.

    Obbard, M.E. 1987. Red squirrel. Pages 264-281. In M. Novak, J.A. Baker, M.E. Obbard and B. Malloch (eds) . Wild. furbearer management and conservation in North America. Ministry of Natural Resources, ON. 1150 pp.

    Palmer, R.S. (ed). 1988. Handbook of North American birds (Volume 5). Yale University Press, New Haven and London, 465 pp.

    Parker, G.R. and S. Luttich. 1986. Characteristics of the wolf (Canis lupus Goldman) in Northern Quebec and Labrador. Arctic 39 (4): 145-149.

    Panktuutit. n.d. In Labrador Inuit Association (LIA). Mineral Development in Northern Labrardor. Nain, Labrador.

    Plumet, P. 1981. Matières premières allochtones et réseau spatial paléoesquimau en Ungava occidental, Arctique québécois. Géographie Physique et Quaternaire, vol. XXXV (1): 5-17.

    Quinn, D.B. 1981. Sources for the Ethnography of Northeastern North America to 1611. National Museum of Man Mercury Series, Canadian Ethnology Paper No. 76.

    Rogers, E. S. and E. Leacock. 1981. Montagnais-Naskapi. pp 169-189. In June Helm (Ed).. Handbook of North American Indians. Vol. 6 June Subarctic. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.

    Ryan, B. 1990. Preliminary geological map of the Nain Plutonic Suite and surrounding rocks (Nain-Nutak, NTS 14 S.W.), scale 1:500,000. Geol. Survey Branch, Dept. of Mines and Energy, St. John's, Nfld. Map 90-44.

    Stenson, G.B. 1994. The Status of Pinnipeds in the Newfoundland Region. NAFO Sci. Coun. Studies, 21:115-119.

    Seaborne Information Technologies Ltd. 1995. Labrador Environmental Issues Affecting Marine Shipping. Document prepared for Teck Corporation, Vancouver, BC.

    Seaconsult. 1988. Physical environmental data for production systems at Terra Nova. Prepared for Petro-Canada by Seaconsult Limited, St. John's, NF.

    Strickland, M.A. and C.W. Douglas. 1987. Marten. In M. Novak, J.A. Baker, M.E. Obbard and B. Malloch (eds) Wild furbearer management and conservation in North America. Ministry of Natural Resources, Ontario. 1150 pp.

    Taylor, J.G. 1977. Traditional Land Use and Occupancy by the Labrador Inuit. pp 49-57. In Our Footprints are Everywhere, C. Brice-Bennett (Ed.),. Labrador Inuit Association, Nain, Labrador.

    Taylor, J. G. 1984. Historical ethnography of the Labrador Coast. pp 508-521. In D. Damas (ed). Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 5. Arctic.

    Them Days. 1997. Life in Voisey's Bay. Them Days 22(2). Them Days, Happy Valley- Goose Bay, Labrador. 1984 p.

    Thomson, C. 1981. Preliminary Archaeological Findings From Shuldham Island, Labrador, 1980. pp. 5-25. In: J. Sproull Thomson and B. Ransom (eds). Archaeology in Newfoundland and Labrador 1980. Historic Resources Division, Government of Newfoundland and Labrador, St. John's, NF.

    Thomson, C. 1982. Archaeological Findings from Saglek Bay, 1981. pp. 5-31 In J. Sproull Thomson and C. Thomson (eds). Archaeology in Newfoundland and Labrador 1981 Historic Resources Division, Government of Newfoundland and Labrador, St. John's, NF.

    Thomson, C. 1988. Late Dorset Shamanism at Shuldham Island 9, Northern Labrador. Unpublished M.A. Thesis, Bryn Mawr College, Bryn Mawr, UK.

    Trimper, P.G., E. Young and T. Chubbs. 1996. Distribution of wintering moose in Labrador and northeastern Quebec. Alces. Vol 32:1-9.

    Tuck, J.A. and W. Fitzhugh. 1986. Palaeo-Eskimo Traditions in Newfoundland and Labrador: A Re-Appraisal. In Palaeo-Eskimo Cultures in Newfoundland, Labrador and Ungava. Reports in Archaeology No. 1, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NF.

    Tuck, J.A. and R. Grenier. 1989. Red Bay, Labrador; World Whaling Capital AD 1550-1600. Atlantic Archaeology Ltd. St. John's, NF.

    Vanstone, J.W. 1985. Material Culture of the Davis Inlet and Barren Ground Naskapi: The William Duncan Strong Collection. Fieldiana Anthropology, New Series, No. 7.

    Voigt, D.R. 1987. Red fox. In M. Novak, J.A. Baker, M.E. Obbard and B. Malloch (eds) Wild furbearer management and conservation in North America. Ministry of Natural Resources, Ontario. 1150 pp.

    Williamson, T. 1997. From Sina to Sikujâ luk: Our Footprint. Mapping Inuit Environmental Knowledge in the Nain District of Northern Labrador. Prepared for the Labrador Inuit Association. Nain, Labrador.

    Woodley, S., J. Kay, and G. Francis (eds.) . 1993. Ecological Integrity and the Management of Ecosystems. St. Lucie Press, Boca Raton, FL.
     
     

    Personal Communications

    Ashini, D., Director, Innu Rights and Environment

    Brazil, J., Non-Consumptive and Endangered Species Biologist, Department of Forest Resources and Agrifoods.

    Innes, L., Innu Nation Environmental Advisor

    Lyle, W., Department of Forest Resources and Agrifoods, Northwest River, Labrador.

    Northcott, T., Scientific Authority and Primary Researcher 1995-1997, VBNC Caribou Component Studies.

    Schaefer, J., Regional Biologist, Labrador Region, Department of Forest Resources and Agrifoods.

    Tuck, J., Archaeology Unit, Department of Anthropology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NF.